data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdc89/fdc89db0b55b5b200f430d36b3b5edeba28beea9" alt=""
Many would agree with this and might also find it odd to hear such a view coming from the likes of Clinton (a former Goldwater Girl in her youth) and Franken, but the what is important, I think, is not that "conservatism" as outlined by Goldwater is lost and needs to be restored, but, rather, that politics has lost its way and has been reduced to fundraising. Goldwater is presented as a deeply complex man -- with his fair share of demons and angst in his own life and those his life affected (most poignantly in the lives of his neglected children) -- who represented more than a brand (that I find very unpersuasive) of political ideology.
The Goldwater of this film represents one of the last "human" politicians. By "human" I mean Goldwater, in this film, is treated as a political subject, not a mere object of that machine we call politics.
Like him or not (Goldwater, that is), this film seems to be a timely thing to watch. And, as far as I can tell, it seems to be a pretty decent piece of documentary journalism too. You may want to check it out at your local library. Something tells me that it is not leaping from the shelves.
1 comment:
Goldwater was,"One of the last 'human' politicians". Yes, I think that's right. Had I recognized that in 1964 I probably would have voted for him. I certanily wouldn't have voted for LBJ. Goldwater was a more fitting heir to the Kennedy legacy, than Johnson was, even on his best day. Being human isn't exactly an asset in politics today. Too bad. It's more often the source of our virtue than our failings.
Post a Comment